Following the controversy trailing the partial removal of petroleum
subsidy, federal and states governments yesterday set up a 12-member
committee to review the subsidy policy with a view to completely
removing it.
The Accountant General of the Federation (AGF), Mr. Jonah Otunla, who
disclosed this in Abuja after the meeting of the Federation Accounts
Allocation Committee (FAAC), noted that the step was at the behest of
the states whose representatives are the Finance Commissioners.
According to him, the committee is made up of six members from the
Commissioners’ Forum and six members from the Accountants General Forum.
The committee’s report is expected before its next meeting in April.
“The committee members expressed their opinion on subsidy and we have
set up a 12-man committee comprising six members from the Commissioners
Forum and six members from the Accountants General Forum to help us
review the impact of subsidy on the federation account. We will make our
opinion known in the nearest future,” he said.
Corroborating the AGF’s assertion, the Chairman of the Commissioners’
Forum, Mr. Timothy Odaah, said the subsidy has succeeded in pauperising
the poor the more as the Nigerian populace appeared to have been
deceived into clamouring for the subsidy.
“We looked at the subsidy on oil as more or less a solution worse
than the problem it intends to solve. You remember that during the
NACOFED meeting in Niger State, it was one of the issues we presented.
Looking at it presently, you discover that it is not solving the
problem, which it is meant to solve. In the first place, the Nigeria
Labour Congress (NLC) and the majority of the Nigerian populace appeared
to have been deceived into clamouring for the subsidy. Because
syndicated projects and programmes were put in, especially with regard
to easing transportation problem. And likewise, tariffs on power supply.
“But you discover now that it is the average man that suffers. You
stand by the street and most of the transporters are not applying any
benefit from the subsidy in what they charge. We know, of course, that
the Federal Government had a good intension to subsidise transportation
so that it will have an absolute benefit to the poor man and every
Nigerian but you discover today that there is no reflection of that
subsidy benefit.
“Besides, it is like a system that robs Peter to pay Paul, makes the
rich to become richer and the poor to become poorer. For example, look
at this simple analysis of econometrics. A poor man has a bicycle or a
motorcycle that uses five-litre full tank. Then you look at the subsidy
granted at 50 kobo, for example. The 50 kobo on five litre motorcycle
will give you N250. Then you look at a big man that has 10 cars. Each of
his cars gets 1000 litres. Then multiply it by 50 kobo, what do you
have? You just remove N100,000 worth of subsidy. That is what the big
man enjoys. Subtract the poor man’s subsidy. What do you have?
“The same thing applies to the states. There are states that are
fully industrialised and you have many industries and factories. And you
use those industries in that particular place. And the people who
benefit more are those states that are fully industrialised because the
fuel consumption of those industries and factories in those states use
more unlike the states that are under-industrialised.
“What we are advocating is that the subsidy should be removed so that
every state or any member of the federating unit, sharing from FAAC
will take its own money and decide to use it or grant subsidy in a level
that it will be able to afford. Then you look at the issue of subsidy
as it applies to individuals. The marketers are not truly showing the
intension of the Federal Government because it has created a very big
market for them in certain ways because transparency is not coming up.
“There are some people who are eating on the subsidy to the
disadvantage of others. It is because of that we passed a resolution at
FAAC and that has been the opinion of the forum of the finance
commissioners that the call should be made to President Goodluck
Jonathan so that he will have to reconsider this subsidy and remove it,”
he submitted.
Meanwhile, the Federal Government, states and local governments
shared the sum of N641,299 billion for the month of February. The sum
of N531,332 billion was available as statutory allocation, N66,801
billion value added tax, N35,549 billion as SUPE-P and N7,617 billion as
NNPC refund.
Out of the statutory allocation, the Federal Government collected
N247,553 billion (52.68 per cent), states received N125,562 billion
(26.72 per cent) while the 774 local governments got N96.796 billion
(20.60 per cent).
The oil-producing states received N58.34 billion as the 13 per cent derivation fund.
From the value added tax, the Federal Government received N9.619
billion, states got N32,065 billion while local governments received
N22,445 billion.
No comments:
Post a Comment